MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747512702 · doi:10.13034/jsst.v10i1.172

Analysis on the Working Condition at Port Radium Mine and Radiation Exposure to Uranium Transporters

2017· article· en· W2747512702 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Junran Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Science and Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUranium mineUraniumRadiumIndigenousPopulationPort (circuit theory)GeographyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental healthRadiochemistryEngineeringMedicineChemistryPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research paper describes how the handling of radioactive ore by indigenous transporters in Canada for the Manhattan Project of the United States in the early-mid 20th century has affected the health of the indigenous population of the time. These Sahtu Dene people resided in Déline, NWT, Canada and from the 1930s through 1940s were hired to carry cloth sacks of radioactive ore at Port Radium, NWT without appropriate personal protective equipment. This resulted in the spreading of radioactive contamination to the transporters as well as their families and community. In this report, we estimate the radiation exposure of a uranium ore transporter and analyzed the corresponding health effects. The objective of this investigation is to reconstruct the dosage received by Dene uranium transporters in the early-mid 20th century. Specifically, this research paper includes information on the uranium supply for the Manhattan Project, possible hazards from transporting radioactive material without proper protective equipment, and a quantitative estimation of radioactive exposure received by an average indigenous transporter. The information presented in this paper aims to provide readers with knowledge of nuclear history and indigenous health history related to this event. Cet article de recherche décrit comment la manipulation du minerai radioactif par les transporteurs indigènes au Canada pour le Projet Manhattan des États-Unis au début du 20e siècle a affecté la santé de la population autochtone de l’époque. Ces personnes de Premières Nations, qui résidaient à Déline, dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest au Canada, ont été embauchées entres les années 1930 et 1940 pour transporter des sacs en tissu de minerai radioactif à Port Radium, dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest, sans équipement de protection approprié. Cela a entraîné la propagation de contaminants radioactifs aux transporteurs, ainsi qu’à leurs familles et à leurs communautés. Ce rapport fournit une estimation de la quantité de rayonnement auquel un transporteur moyen a été exposé et analyse ses effets sur la santé. Ces risques pour la santé prévus ont ensuite été comparés aux statistiques rapportées dans le rapport de la Commission canadienne de l’uranium de Déline. L’objectif de cette enquête est de comprendre l’impact de la manipulation du minerai radioactif au début du 20e siècle sur la santé de la population autochtone. Plus précisément, ce document de recherche comprend des informations sur l’approvisionnement en uranium du projet Manhattan, les risques possibles liés au transport de matières radioactives sans équipement de protection approprié et une estimation quantitative de l’exposition radioactive que le transporteur indigène moyen a reçue. L’information présentée dans cet article vise à fournir des connaissances sur l’histoire de la santé nucléaire et autochtone liée à cet événement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Student Science and TechnologySame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207