“Reverse Marketization”: Market Failure or Deficiency in Management?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Government purchase of services is considered to be a service delivery mechanism that can improve efficiency and economize costs. This mechanism has been popularized all over the world. However, at the same time, “reverse marketization” has been a common occurrence in the past few years. According to some scholars, “reverse marketization” is evidence of market failure, so they object to outsourcing contract in public services. This paper classifies market failure into four types and makes a case analysis of one of the four types. The case of reserve environmental sanitation service contracting testifies that in the model of low defect of supplier and low defect of demander, market failure will not inevitably give rise to “reverse marketization”. The direct cause is deficiency in management of the government. With regard to the actual situation of government management, this paper also puts forward the viewpoint that the government should act as “an open-minded purchaser”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it