Biocompatible and Biodegradable Bioplastics Constructed from Chitin via a “Green” Pathway for Bone Repair
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biodegradable plastics are urgently needed in the biomedical field to avoid the secondary surgery for implants after completing the repair of nonload bearing bone defects. Herein, novel chitin based plastics were successfully fabricated by changing the shape and aggregation state structure of chitin hydrogels through drying under a negative pressure, which led to a plastic deformation. The chitin hydrogels were prepared by using an environmentally friendly aqueous NaOH/urea solvent, and then radially oriented under the negative pressure to form chitin bioplastics (CP) on the basis of the removability of the chitin molecular bundles in the hydrogels. Moreover, hydroxyapatite (HAP) was in situ synthesized to obtain the chitin/HAP composite plastics (CHP). Their structure and properties were characterized by SEM, FTIR, 13 C NMR, X-ray diffraction and mechanical testing. The results indicated that the bioplastic preparation was a “green” physical process, and the incorporation of HAP reinforced significantly the tensile strength of CHP. The viability, biocompatibility, hemocompatibility and in vivo histocompatibility of the bioplastics were evaluated systematically. The introduction of HAP could improve the cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of the osteoblast cells. Moreover, CHP exhibited good histocompatibility, hemocompatibility and in vivo biodegradability, showing potential application in the bone tissue engineering field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it