MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747746134 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2017.2741481

An Incentive Mechanism Integrating Joint Power, Channel and Link Management for Social-Aware D2D Content Sharing and Proactive Caching

2017· article· en· W2747746134 on OpenAlexaff
Changyan Yi, Shiwei Huang, Jun Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkBase stationCacheTelecommunications linkPower controlWirelessScheduling (production processes)Distributed computingPower (physics)TelecommunicationsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a downlink cellular traffic offloading framework with social-aware device-to-device (D2D) content sharing and proactive caching is studied. In the considered system model, each user equipment (UE) is intelligent to determine which content(s) to request/cache and to share according to its own preference. As the central controller, the base station (BS) can establish cellular transmissions and/or incentivize D2D communications for content dissemination (including proactive caching). By taking into account wireless features, social characteristics, and device intelligence, we formulate a welfare maximization problem integrating power control, channel allocation, link scheduling, and reward design. To solve this complicated problem, we propose a novel mechanism which consists of a newly developed optimization approach, called basis transformation method, for the joint resource management, and a specially devised pricing scheme for the reward determination. Theoretical and simulation results examine the desired properties of our proposed mechanism, and demonstrate its superiority in improving social welfare, network capacity, and utility of the BS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207