MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747773340

Dany Laferrière: un Écrivain Magico-Réaliste?

2017· article· fr· W2747773340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean Danner

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans ce mémoire, nous aborderons les questions du rêve, du temps et de l’identité dans trois livres de Dany Laferrière : L’Odeur du café [1991], Je suis un écrivain japonais [2008] et L’Enigme du retour [2009]. Ce premier récit propose une remémoration des souvenirs d’un jeune garçon qui grandit à Petit-Goave en Haïti avec sa grand-mère. Il fait la narration de son enfance tout en démontrant l’espoir d’un peuple vivant sous la dictature de Duvalier. Dans Je suis un écrivain japonais, Laferrière aborde la question de l’appartenance. Est-il possible de se réclamer d’un pays étranger à celui dans lequel on est né ? Laferrière lui-même se sent appartenir à plusieurs pays. L‘Énigme du retour raconte le « retour au pays natal » de Laferrière après la mort de son père. Il s’agit, aussi, d’un voyage dans le temps pour un écrivain qui a quitté Haïti pour vivre en exil à Montréal il y a trente-trois ans. À travers ces trois livres, nous chercherons à démontrer comment Laferrière emploie un style magico-réaliste. Cette recherche contribue à l’étude de l’œuvre de Laferrière et à la façon dont elle participe de l’identité québécoise et haïtienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.020
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)Same topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207