MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747895840 · doi:10.1093/hgs/dcx038

The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (Mel'nyk Faction) and the Holocaust: The Case of Ivan Iuriiv

2017· article· en· W2747895840 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuri Radchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueHolocaust and Genocide Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianThe HolocaustSupporterGermanNazismPoliticsWorld War IIEthnic groupPolitical scienceJudaismLawGender studiesSociologyHistoryGenealogyArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the career path of Ivan Iuriiv, a supporter of the faction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists led by Andrii Mel'nyk (OUN-M). During World War II Iuriiv joined Sonderkommando 10a of Einsatzgruppe D, and as a member of this detachment he played an active role in the extermination of Jewish communities in occupied territories of the Ukraine and the RSFSR. The author uses unpublished sources from German, Ukrainian, American, and Israeli archives to examine Iuriiv's political views, his involvement in Nazi crimes, his role as an OUN-M activist in the creation of Ukrainian auxiliary police forces in occupied Soviet territories, and his postwar fate in Western Europe and Canada. This close examination of Iuriiv's career and experiences contributes to our understanding of the participation of ethnic Germans in the Holocaust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHolocaust and Genocide StudiesSame topicGerman History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207