MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747960616 · doi:10.1080/14749009.2017.1363991

Improved grade control in open pit mines

2017· article· en· W2747960616 on OpenAlexaff
Y. V. Vasylchuk, Clayton V. Deutsch

Bibliographic record

VenueMining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen-pit miningMining engineeringGeologyForensic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grade control in hard-rock open pit mining is the process of determining the destination for the mined material. Numerical studies are undertaken to show how grade control can be improved, that is, less ore sent to the waste dump and less waste sent to the mill. The improvements in four aspects of grade control are proposed: (1) the grade predictions should be made at a resolution of one quarter of the blasthole spacing or less depending on computational restrictions, (2) the assignment of grades should consider uncertainty to optimize the chosen destination, (3) the blast movement of rock should be considered, and (4) the destination should be optimized on the smallest unit of selection possible; ideally truck-by-truck. These improvements are developed with examples and then a case study is presented. The amount of rock sent to the wrong destination is reduced by two to five percent with the proposed improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and MetallurgySame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207