Impact of tumoral carbonic anhydrase IX and Ki‑67 expression on survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most commonly diagnosed type of head and neck cancer, accounting for ~300,000 new cases worldwide annually. Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) and Ki‑67 have been associated with reduced disease‑specific survival (DSS) in patients with OSCC. We previously proposed a combined CAIX and Ki‑67 signature of ‘functional hypoxia’ and sought to replicate this association in a larger independent cohort of patients with OSCC at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) in Seattle. The study population included patients with incident primary OSCC treated at the University of Washington Medical Center and the Harborview Medical Center in Seattle between December 2003 and February 2012. Archived tumor blocks were obtained with tissue samples from 189 patients, and triplicate 0.6 mm cores were assembled into tissue microarrays (TMAs). Fluorescence immunohistochemistry and AQUAnalysis® were used to quantify the expression of tumoral CAIX (tCAIX) and stromal CAIX (sCAIX) and tumoral Ki‑67 for each TMA core. Hazard ratios for DSS were calculated using Cox proportional hazards analysis. High tCAIX and sCAIX expression levels were associated with reduced DSS (aHR=1.003, 95% CI:1.00‑1.01 and aHR=1.010, 95% CI:1.001‑1.019, per AQUA score unit, respectively). Ki‑67 expression was not associated with survival (aHR=1.01, 95% CI:0.99‑1.02) in the FHCRC cohort. DSS for patients with high sCAIX and low Ki‑67 did not differ from that of other patient groups. Elevated tCAIX was associated with reduced DSS as a continuous and as a dichotomized (75%) variable. sCAIX was associated with DSS as a continuous variable but not when dichotomized (75%). However, the previously proposed ‘functional hypoxia’ signature was not replicated in the current FHCRC study. The failure to replicate our prior observation of poorer survival in patients with combined high sCAIX and low tumoral Ki‑67 was likely due to the absence of an association between tumoral Ki‑67 and DSS in this cohort. However, the association between DSS and tCAIX and sCAIX supports a role for CAIX in OSCC clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".