Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quelle est la pertinence de la recherche-action ? Ne sert-elle pas d’analyseur des résistances de toute organisation syndicale ou politique à remettre en question son programme de lutte ? Sur la base d’expériences de formation et de recherche récentes, l’auteur signale qu’il n’est pas suffisant de privilégier un terrain d’intervention en raison d’options idéologiques ou politiques, comme la formation syndicale ou un mouvement social, pour qu’une recherche réelle se mette en place. Toute démarche de recherche requiert une implication énorme des chercheurs mobilisés, ce qui ralentit le processus de recherche et entraîne une dilution des résultats. Le groupe demandeur devient le principal interlocuteur de la démarche, juge de sa qualité et de sa pertinence. C’est à partir d’un lieu universitaire concret de formation des adultes que s’exprime l’auteur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".