Modified partial least square for diagnosing key‐performance‐indicator‐related faults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Standard partial least square (PLS) is a useful tool for process monitoring; however, it still encounters some problems for the diagnosis of key performance indicator (KPI) faults. One of its recent modifications, improved PLS (IPLS), decomposes the process measurements into KPI‐related and KPI‐unrelated parts according to the correlation matrix obtained from the standard PLS. The entire residual space of PLS is categorized as the IPLS's KPI‐unrelated part. However, the residual space still involves some information related to KPI, and hence IPLS's decomposition may be inappropriate. In this study, a new modified PLS is proposed, which also decomposes the residual space according to the KPI. The loadings of input data are first decomposed to obtain a projection model. Next, the input data are more appropriately decomposed into KPI‐related and KPI‐unrelated parts. Correspondingly, two statistic indices can be designed for fault diagnosis. A numerical example and the Tennessee‐Eastman (TE) benchmark process are utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".