An Elusive Search for Community: Globalization and the Canadian National Identities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolPendant plus de trente ans, l’Etat providence et le liberalisme ont marque la geographie politique du Canada. L’Etat providence etait percu a l’epoque comme un signe de maturite, une precondition necessaire a la stabilite politique et a une certaine cohesion sociale, mettant ainsi fin a « l’ideologie ». Toutefois, ce consensus de l’apres-guerre a ete remis en question, a partir des annees 80, laissant place a ce que l’auteure appelle « la mondialisation neoliberale », qui inclut des notions telles que la privatisation, la dereglementation, le libre marche et l’erosion du secteur public. L’auteure examine l’insaisissable recherche de l’identite canadienne dans une ere de mondialisation liberale. Elle avance que l’Etat a toujours ete un acteur central dans la creation des perceptions de soi et de la collectivite et tente de determiner si l’identite nationale canadienne peut etre preservee et comment elle peut l’etre dans un tel cadre. EnglishFor over thirty years, the welfare state and liberalism have marked the political geography of Canada. The welfare state was perceived at the time as a sign of maturity, a necessary precondition to political stability and to a certain degree of social cohesion, while putting an end to “ideology.” However, this postbellum consensus was brought back into question, starting in the 1980s, giving way to what the author calls “the neo-liberal globalization” which includes notions such as privatization, deregulation, free markets and the erosion of the public sector. The author examines the elusive search for the Canadian identity in an era of liberal globalization. She proposes that the State has always been a central actor in the creation of the perceptions of self and of the collective and tries to determine if the Canadian national identity can be preserved and how it can be done in such a framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".