MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2748814712 · doi:10.7202/1040856ar

Une mission féministe ou une mission de femmes? Les Soeurs des Saints Noms de Jésus et de Marie au Pérou et au Brésil (1960-1985)

2017· article· fr· W2748814712 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dominique Laperle

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes d histoire religieuse · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte désire mesurer la place du féminisme dans l’expérience missionnaire des Soeurs des Saints Noms de Jésus et de Marie au Pérou et au Brésil entre 1960 et 1985. Pour plusieurs religieuses, l’idée de ministères traditionnels ou inédits dans de nouveaux champs apostoliques leur a permis d’élargir le sens de leur vocation. La question des femmes prendra, avec l’ aggiornamento conciliaire, un nouvel élan. À travers un patient travail de fond, les SNJM se sont inculturées dans leurs différents milieux d’insertion en intégrant une vision d’avenir des femmes. Cette étude permet donc de revoir la nature même des fonctions missionnaires des religieuses et bouscule la vision genrée de l’apostolat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes d histoire religieuseSame topicReligion and Society in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207