MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2748837252 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01849

Self-Modeling Multivariate Curve Resolution Model for Online Monitoring of Bitumen Conversion Using Infrared Spectroscopy

2017· article· en· W2748837252 on OpenAlexafffund
Dereje Tamiru Tefera, Ankit Agrawal, Lina M. Yañez Jaramillo, Arno de Klerk, Vinay Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsInfrared spectroscopyResolution (logic)Biological systemChemometricsComputer scienceInfraredSpectral lineAsphaltSpectroscopyProcess (computing)Process engineeringChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningChromatographyOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the efficient real-time monitoring of reaction chemistry in a complex mixture using online spectroscopy, it is essential to develop a mathematical tool that can automatically resolve the spectra so that either the spectral or the concentration profile of the changing species can be tracked easily. While self-modeling multivariate curve resolution (SMCR) is a well-suited tool when initial profiles are known beforehand, it is not straightforward to use when dealing with complex mixtures. In this study, a multivariate data analysis algorithm was designed for use with online infrared spectroscopy to provide an instant best estimate of the reaction chemistry of a complex mixture with no additional user input. The investigated process is thermal conversion of oil sands bitumen, and the study employed 43 infrared spectra from samples, collected offline, of products treated at different temperatures and time periods. The resolved spectral and concentration profiles can be used to understand the reaction mechanism of the system. In addition to the concentration and spectral profile, simple parameters were devised to monitor the changes in the key regions of the spectral profiles. In general, the results described the possible reaction mechanism of the investigated system and were consistent with other experimental findings in the literature. Computationally, the algorithm requires only a few seconds to converge and is therefore suitable for online monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207