Thy-1 stimulation of mouse T cells induces a delayed T cell receptor-like signal that results in Ca2+-independent cytotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antibody-mediated crosslinking of Thy-1 [also known as cluster of differentiation (CD)90], results in a T cell receptor (TcR)‑like signal; however, the impact of Thy‑1 stimulation in comparison to TcR stimulation on T cell activation and effector function has yet to be fully elucidated. In the present study, the outcome of Thy‑1‑ and TcR‑induced stimulation of T cells was investigated in mice, using fragment crystalizable (Fc) receptor‑bound antibodies and costimulatory signals provided by syngeneic lipopolysaccharide‑matured bone marrow‑derived dendritic cells. Compared with TcR signaling, Thy‑1 signaling initiated a less robust proliferative response in T cells, as determined by tritiated‑thymidine incorporation. In addition, enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assays revealed that interleukin‑2 production was reduced, and the expression of CD25 and cyclin D3 was weaker in Thy‑1‑stimulated cells, as determined by western blotting; however, the expression of cyclin‑dependent kinase 6 was similar to that in TcR‑induced T cells. Furthermore, western blotting demonstrated that the phosphorylation of ζ-chain‑associated protein kinase 70 and extracellular signal‑regulated kinase 1/2 was delayed following Thy‑1 stimulation. DNA fragmentation assays revealed that cytotoxic effector function was also slower to develop in Thy‑1‑stimulated T cells, required more time to be effective and was largely Ca2+‑independent; these findings suggested that Fas ligand rather than granule‑associated perforin was involved in T cell effector function. In conclusion, the present results suggested that Thy‑1 signaling may contribute to the regulation of T cell homeostasis and the development of non‑specific T cell‑mediated cytotoxicity. However, further studies are required to elucidate the exact physiological roles of TcR‑like signals that result from Thy‑1 crosslinking and to investigate the molecular mechanisms that are involved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".