MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2748967854 · doi:10.11159/ehst17.116

Selective Solar Concentrators for Biofuel Production and Photovoltaic Applications

2017· article· en· W2748967854 on OpenAlexaff
Nima Talebzadeh, Paul G. O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Energy Harvesting, Storage, and Transfer · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemProduction (economics)BiofuelEnvironmental scienceEngineering physicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Algae-based biofuels have become of increasing interest in recent years as a renewable energy source to replace energy derived from fossil fuels. Algae exhibits remarkable potential for producing large amounts of energy, for example as much as 60% of their Biomass can be converted to oil, with 30 to 50% more energy output per gallon than gasoline Algae also generates about 60% of the Earth's atmospheric oxygen and, in good cultivation conditions, algae produces protein and energy biomass 30 to 100 times faster than land plants Furthermore, algae does not require the entire incident solar spectrum to perform photosynthesis. That is, algae primarily utilizes the blue and red portions of the solar spectrum, referred to as Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR), while a large portion of the green and near-infrared light received from the sun is not used in the photosynthetic reaction In this context, incident solar radiation can be utilized for agrivoltaic applications The incident PAR and non-PAR solar irradiance is used to simultaneously drive biofuel production and photovoltaic cells, respectively. For this purpose, photonic micro/nano structures are integrated into solar spectrum splitters that transmit PAR to enable underlying algae cultivation, while concentrating non-PAR at the side-walls of the solar spectrum splitter to power photovoltaic cells. Moreover, in this study we also investigate the benefits of utilizing the aforementioned solar spectrum splitter in energy efficient agrivoltaic greenhouses that generate photovoltaic power while producing crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference of Energy Harvesting, Storage, and TransferSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207