La salud sexual y reproductiva de las mujeres migrantes en Argentina (Córdoba)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aunque la salud sexual y reproductiva (SSR) esta reconocida como un derecho fundamental que permite a las mujeres tener un control mas grande sobre su vida, el estado de la SSR de las mujeres migrantes es considerada significativamente menos buena a las de no-migrantes. De hecho, como la salud en general, la SSR de las migrantes se ve afectada negativamente por las formas de dominacion relacionado al genero, a la clase social y a la raza. Un caso que ilustra bien este fenomeno es el caso de las migrantes bolivianas en Cordoba, Argentina. Con base en el analisis de un grupo de enfoque y doce entrevistas individuales, este trabajo se propone investigar como las migrantes bolivianas de Cordoba viven y perciben sus experiencias en SSR. Ademas, esta investigacion quiere identificar los principales obstaculos y estrategias de negociacion usados por estas mujeres. Estudiar la SSR de las mujeres migrantes podria contribuir a remediar su invisibilizacion y potencialmente ofrecerles los servicios correspondidos. ormal style='text-align:justify;text-indent:35.45pt;tab-stops: 127.6pt 163.05pt'>Estas situaciones plantean la necesidad de revisar la eficacia de los instrumentos juridicos que consagran derechos. Y precisamente, el debate feminista es fundamental para la construccion de una perspectiva juridica que permita un analisis critico de las instituciones del derecho, y realice aportes tendientes a la deconstruccion y reconstruccion de esas instituciones que legitiman la violencia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".