MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessing the Readiness of Africa for the Physical Internet

2016· article· en· W2749036840 on OpenAlexaff
Radjabu Mayuto, Parfait Sèbédji Aïhounhin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the African Futures Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationStrengths and weaknessesThe InternetOrder (exchange)SustainabilityRationalityBusinessEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental planningMarketingComputer scienceGeographyEconomicsPolitical scienceFinancePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In general, infrastructure is a real handicap that needs to be overcome in order to achieve optimal business performance in Africa. This raises veritable problems of rationality, sustainability and logistics efficiency identified by the notion of the Physical Internet. Based on content analysis, this paper takes into account the present reality of logistics in Africa, and provides an assessment of the economical, environmental and social logistics therein. The areas covered in this study are: air, land across the road and rail, maritime and river, and telecommunications. The study highlights the African logistics challenges, weaknesses, threats, strengths and opportunities. It also highlights the level of each sector and how logistics in Africa is implemented at national, regional (intracontinental) and intercontinental levels. In order to attract the attention of stakeholders on the challenges, a readiness map is proposed relative to the operationalization of the Physical Internet in Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the African Futures ConferenceSame topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207