Effect of Ga addition on the valence state of Ce and magnetic properties of melt-spun Ce17Fe78-xB6Gax (x = 0-1.0) ribbons
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Ce17Fe78-xB6Gax (x=0-1.0) ribbons were fabricated by a melt-spinning technique in order to study the mechanism of the valence variation of Ce and their magnetic properties as well as improve the thermal stability of Ce-based rare earth permanent magnets. The systematic investigations of the Ce17Fe78-xB6Gax (x=0-1.0) alloys show that the room-temperature coercivity increases significantly from 352 kA/m at x = 0 to 492 kA/m at x = 1.0. The Curie temperature (Tc) increases monotonically from 424.5 K to 433.6 K, and the temperature coefficients of remanence (α) and coercivity (β) of the ribbons are better off from -0.56 %/K, -0.75 %/K for x = 0 to -0.45 %/K, -0.65 %/K for x = 0.75 in the temperature range of 300–400 K, respectively. The Ce L3-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectrums reveal that there is more Ce4+ in ribbons under total electron yield than fluorescence yield as Ce has a high affinity with oxygen. The weight of Ce3+ increases while the weight of Ce4+ decreases in Ga-added alloys. The refined grain size and a more uniform microstructure are mainly attributed to the improved magnetic properties and thermal stability with Ga doping. This paper may serve as a reference for further developing the so-called gap magnets and the effective utilization of the rare earth resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it