MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749221109 · doi:10.25071/0848-1563.39156

“Righteousness Exalteth a Nation”: Providence, Empire, and the Forging of the Early Canadian Presbyterian Identity

2008· article· en· W2749221109 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denis McKim

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Papers · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRighteousnessEmpireIdentity (music)ForgingHistoryReligious studiesPolitical scienceAncient historySociologyPhilosophyTheologyAestheticsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Arcadian Adventures with the Idle Rich, Stephen Leacock satirises the fictional Presbyterian Church of St. Osoph. Implicitly critiquing the denomination's reputation for fractiousness and austerity, he observes that the congregation of St. Osoph's is so thoroughly quarrelsome that it has severed its ties to virtually every other Presbyterian group. St. Osoph's, Leacock irreverently elaborates, seceded forty years ago from the original body to which it belonged, and later on, with three other churches, it seceded from the group of seceding congregations. Still later it fell into a difference with the three other churches on the question of eternal punishment, the word "eternal" not appearing to the elders of St. Osoph's to designate a sufficiently long period. The dispute ended in a secession which left the church of St. Osoph practically isolated in a world of sin whose approaching fate it neither denied nor deplored. 2 Satirizing St. Osoph's -and, by extension, the larger Presbyterian community to which it belonged -was surely Leacock's chief objective. Yet it should not go unnoticed that his sketch also sheds considerable light on the Presbyterian ethos of the day. 3 Perhaps the most revealing aspect of Leacock's account is his depiction of the divisive tendency that beset this ill-tempered congrega-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical PapersSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207