Médias communautaires au Québec : état de marginalité ou marginalité d’État
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Québec est longtemps apparu comme la terre de prédilection des médias communautaires. Ces pratiques ont le plus souvent été liées à des projets d’aide gouvernementale. Mais actuellement les subventions d’État ne peuvent plus suffire à assurer la continuité de ces expériences. On ne peut considérer les médias communautaires comme un bloc homogène ou leur prêter une image d’expériences progressistes ou d’alternatives par simple opposition aux médias de masse. Pour les comprendre et en mesurer les enjeux, il convient de situer les médias communautaires dans le cadre du développement politique, économique et culturel de la société québécoise. C’est précisément à quoi s’attache cet article qui dresse un cadre d’analyse global de compréhension des médias et tente d’évaluer leur développement probable dans un contexte de pénurie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".