Redefining the “Normal” Worker: Law and Policy Choices for Work–Family Balance in Canada: Redéfinir le ‘travailleur normal’: Regard sur les choix législatifs et de politiques publiques en matière de conciliation travail-famille au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the need to reconcile work and family life has been recognized in discrete ways in legislation and policy over the years, there has not been a substantial shift away from the archetype of the "unencumbered" (male) worker to a new model of the "normal" worker. In Canada and elsewhere, legislative protection does not allow women or men to effectively reconcile work and family responsibilities over the life cycle. This paper examines the different ways in which work-family balance is regulated, with a focus on the Canadian federal jurisdiction and the province of Quebec, and underlines the need for coherent labor and social policy. The paper also explores the development of multi-stakeholder initiatives on work-family balance, including the development of voluntary standards and a proposal for a work-family "framework" law to ensure coherence among different laws and programs affecting work-family balance. The paper concludes by confirming the need to move away from an individualized approach toward a more mainstreamed and collectivized approach to work-family balance. Résumé Bien que la nécessité de concilier travail et vie familiale ait fait l'objet d'une reconnaissance timide dans la législation et les politiques publiques au fil des ans, il n'y a pas eu de changement substantiel de l'archétype du travailleur « sans engagements » (homme) vers un nouveau modèle de « travailleur normal ». Au Canada et ailleurs, la protection législative ne permet pas aux femmes ou aux hommes d'arrimer efficacement leurs responsabilités professionnelles et familiales au cours de leur vie. Cet article examine les différentes façons dont la conciliation travail-famille est réglementée, particulièrement en droit fédéral canadien et dans la province de Québec, et souligne la nécessité d'une politique sociale et de travail cohérente. Le texte explore également le développement d'initiatives multipartites, y compris l'élaboration de normes volontaires de style ISO et une proposition de loi-cadre travail-famille afin d'assurer une cohérence entre les différents lois et programmes touchant la conciliation famille-travail au Québec. L'article conclut en confirmant la nécessité de passer d'une approche individualisée à une approche plus intégrée et collectivisée de la conciliation travail-famille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".