MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749403371 · doi:10.5539/cis.v10n3p54

Research and Application of Data Mining in College Students' Employment Based on Association Rules

2017· article· en· W2749403371 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lijuan Liu, Zhai Changliang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAI and HR Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceApriori algorithmAssociation rule learningIdeal (ethics)Affect (linguistics)Object (grammar)Association (psychology)A priori and a posterioriWarning systemResearch ObjectData scienceData miningKnowledge managementArtificial intelligenceBusinessLawPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper takes the employment information data of university graduates as the research object, and takes Apriori algorithm as the main idea, develops a data mining system for early warning of student employment information and new functions of teacher guidance and employment, finds out some factors that affect the employment situation, and realizes the early warning to the students who may not be able to obtain employment smoothly and the teachers who may not have an ideal employment rate. So that managers can obtain more valuable knowledge and information, better management, improve employment rate, and enhance the competitiveness of institutions of higher learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicAI and HR TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207