MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749491043 · doi:10.3138/jcs.50.3.669

Turning Point: The Origins of Canadian Content Requirements for Commercial Radio

2017· article· en· W2749491043 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Éric Spalding

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Relevance (law)Music industryCommercial broadcastingPoint (geometry)The InternetContent (measure theory)Turning pointSociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceAdvertisingBusinessHistoryLawComputer scienceArtArchaeologyPeriod (music)Public broadcastingWorld Wide WebAestheticsMusic education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation of Canadian content requirements for AM radio in 1971 was a turning point for the music industry in Canada. This article explores the context that led to the creation of a 30% quota for Canadian music on commercial radio. It subsequently examines some of the arguments raised at the time for and against such requirements, and then covers the impact of this ruling on the Canadian music industry. The article concludes with a reflection on the relevance of Canadian content today, at a time when many Canadians listen to music on the Internet and satellite radio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.313
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.078 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital MediaFrench-language works237,207