Comparing Crystallizations in Three Dimensions and Two Dimensions: Behavior of Isomers of [2,2′-Bipyridine]dicarbonitrile and [1,10-Phenanthroline]dicarbonitrile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various symmetric isomers of [2,2′-bipyridine]dicarbonitrile and [1,10-phenanthroline]dicarbonitrile were crystallized from solution and also deposited as monolayers adsorbed on graphite. The resulting three- and two-dimensional (3D and 2D) structures were studied by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and scanning tunneling microscopy, respectively. Previous comparisons of 3D and 2D structures have provided new understanding of molecular organization and have revealed that crystals and adlayers can have closely analogous structures despite the effects of the underlying surface, especially when organization is dominated by strong intermolecular interactions within a single plane. The present study extends previous work by showing that analogous 3D and 2D structures can be formed even when association is directed by weaker intermolecular forces, as exemplified by C–H···N interactions of nitriles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".