MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749580936 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53825-3_10

Çatalhöyük, Archaeology, Violence

2017· book-chapter· en· W2749580936 on OpenAlex
Christopher J. Knüsel, Bonnie Glencross

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicViolence, Religion, and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Reading (process)SociologyHistoryCriminologyPsychologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceLawArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Issues of violence were, until recently, neglected in studies of the Neolithic. Evidence of conflict was not sought, and potentially linked finds were ascribed to a different (often ritualistic) cause or significance. René Girard’s perspective provides archaeologists with the opportunity to support a more literal reading of imagery with physical evidence that might support the mimetic thesis: that there is a relationship between violence and religion in the genesis and maintenance of culture. An outlet must be found to dissipate reprisal violence in human groups because, if left unchecked, reprisal violence resulting from desire of the same things, both materially and socially, would spiral out of control and threaten the stability and, ultimately, the continued existence of the social group, especially in earliest densely populated villages. The goal here is to present evidence based on the study of humans remains that support Girard’s thesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it