60 GHz antenna array for millimeter‐wave wireless sensor devices using silver nanoparticles ink mounted on a flexible polymer substrate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper demonstrates a mm‐wave high‐gain antenna design that is printed on a flexible polymer substrate using silver nanoparticles ranging from 50 to 200 nm in inkjet printing technology. Specifically, it shows that inkjet technology can leverage to fully fabricated antennas with this technology, where it provides both the characterization and preparation of an antenna. The initial fabrication problem addressed via ink formulation for printing a homogeneous layer with an excellent electrical conductivity. A planar series fed antenna array was analyzed by using the Transmission Line Model with tapering feed line structure. The excitation coefficients in both E and H planes follow a uniform aperture distribution. The realized antenna has 24 dBi gain, the side‐lobe level of elevation direction at the center frequency is lower than −15dB. In combination with the planar antenna structure, polymer substrate, and inkjet printing enables the production of structures with high gain that are widely applicable for mm‐wave wireless sensors and portable communication devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it