<i>Visual Words: Art and the Material Book in Victorian England</i>, by Gerard Curtis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
development of the Unitarian religion.Medically, it provides the first accurate description of pulmonary circulation through the heart and lungs.Clearly based upon Servetus's anatomical work and dissections in Paris, the description improved upon Vesalius and predated William Harvey by 75 years.Concerning the three surv-iving copies -Bibliotheque nationale de France, National Library of Austria, and Edinburgh University Library -their vicissitudes over time before finding permanent homes are well recounted by the Goldstones.Attention is also paid to the 1790 Murr reprint that is nearly as rare as the original.An important Canadian connection occurs with various attempts to ensure Servetus's being recognized for important medical contributions, by Sir William Osler whose copy of the Murr reprint is now in McGill University's Osler Library.Although a serious scholar will undoubtedly wish to consult other sources, this study will provide the non-specialist with an easily accessible and readable introduction to one of the most intriguing stories in book, medical, and religious history.It is illustrated and indexed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.119 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".