MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749883754 · doi:10.1071/aj13047

Structural architecture and basin evaluation of the North West Shelf

2014· article· en· W2749883754 on OpenAlexaff
Lynn Pryer, J.E. Blevin, Gabriel Nelson, Guillaume Sanchez, Jen-Deng Lee, Donna Cathro, Rod Graham, Brian Horn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe APPEA Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyRiftStructural basinPaleontologyCrustContinental marginPassive marginHydrocarbon explorationContinental crustEarth scienceTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The WestraliaSPAN 2D regional program extends across all basins of Australia’s North West Shelf (Carnarvon/Roebuck/Browse/Bonaparte basins) and Arafura regions. The survey is designed with long offset and record length (18 sec) acquisition parameters to image the important deep crustal and sub-crustal architecture and depositional systems across this complex margin. The regional program provides unique, state-of-the-art depth imaging of deep-basement rift structures of the Westralian Superbasin, as well as the lower crust and Moho. The survey has multiple transects which cross the transition from continental to oceanic crust that provides insight into the distribution of volcanics and a possible hyper-extended rift margin. An integrated geological and geophysical interpretation encompasses available well, seismic and potential field data. Gravity models were developed to aid in-depth conversion and the structural interpretation of the deep crust and Moho. A comprehensive model of basin formation provides the context for regional correlation of tectonostratigraphic packages throughout these linked basin systems, highlighting pre-Jurassic rift basins and their structural controls. While the North West Shelf, Browse and Bonaparte basins are proven and established hydrocarbon provinces, a future step-change in exploration concepts involves an integrated, margin-scale understanding of these basin systems and their potential resources. Collectively, the new dataset and interpretation will aid explorers in understanding the nature and distribution of key petroleum systems elements (reservoir/source/seal) and processes (heatflow, timing of source maturity, expulsion, migration and entrapment).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe APPEA JournalSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207