Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter represents a preliminary effort to understand the health implications of transnsational \neconomic integration (globalization) for population health in Canadian metropolitan areas, and to \ninform the development of policy responses and strategies of resistance. Special emphasis is placed \non health equity as it is affected by social determinants of health. I first provide a stylized \ndescription of the rationale for concentrating on major metropolitan areas, rather than on \nCanadian society as a whole, with reference to the evidence base on place-related effects on health. \nI then summarize the major channels of influence leading from globalization to social determinants \nof health in metropolitan areas. These involve labour markets; the attractiveness of urban \n‘revitalization’ schemes in a context of changing opportunities for capital accumulation and growth \npromotion; and migration. The chapter concludes with some rather pessimistic observations about \nthe prospects for increased health equity, given today’s neoliberal drift in public policy and \npressures for policy convergence around economic competitiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it