MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749954884 · doi:10.14288/jaaacs.v12i1.189707

Against Epistemological Fascism: The (Self) Critique of the Criticals - A Reading of Paraskeva's Itinerant Curriculum Theory

2017· article· en· W2749954884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologySociologyCurriculumCurriculum theoryHegemonyPoliticsContext (archaeology)Critical theoryEpistemologySocial sciencePedagogyLawCurriculum developmentPolitical scienceHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of richest and most central aspects of curriculum studies is conflict—sometimes aggressive—between different epistemological perspectives within and beyond the same ideological turf. Looking to the history of the field since the turn of the nineteenth century, such conflict is quite visible, not only in the perpetual battles for control, but also in how such struggles actually constitute the very enzyme of the field. Such battles are not socially sanitized, and the struggle for the US curriculum field has been an ideological carnage against eugenics—exposing class, race and gender battles within, between and beyond dominant and counter-dominant traditions and crossing cultural, economic and political dynamics (Apple, 1990; Giroux, 1981; Kliebard, 1995; Schubert, 1986, Schubert, Lopez Schubert, Thomas, & Caroll, 2002; Pinar, 1975; Grumet, 1981, Miller, 2006, Watkins, 2001; Paraskeva, 2011). In this context, Paraskeva’s (2011; 2016a) most recent work pushes the struggle over the curriculum to another level by denouncing the field itself as the leading ideological locomotive of epistemicide. In a full-blast and comprehensive ‘self critique of curriculum studies’ and critical theorists, Paraskeva denounces both hegemonic and counter hegemonic theorists as players in such curriculum epistemicide. Maria Luiza Süssekind is a mother of two who writes from the South. As a Brazilian scholar, she works primarily with subjects related to social and cognitive justice within curriculum, educational policies for difference, and the marks of colonialism as epistemicides and patriarchalism within elementary public schools. Currently, Süssekind coordinates the Curriculum WG at ANPEd (Brazilian Association for post-graduation and research in Education). After teaching History at elementary schools for 12 years she achieved a Magister Scientia degree at UFRRJ (Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro) and Doctorate in Education at UERJ (State University of Rio de Janeiro) and since 2009 works as a professor at UNIRIO (Federal UNiversity of Rio de Janeiro State). With several articles and books published in Portuguese she has been investing in internationalization since 2011 when she did a postdoctoral study with William F. Pinar at UBC/Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it