MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

De como o acontecimento se torna: reflexões sobre experiência e partilha

2017· article· pt· W2749982824 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Zamin, Lara Nasi, Reges Schwaab

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERIN · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural, Media, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ao considerar que o acontecimento não é apenas da ordem do que ocorre, mas de como ele se torna, o artigo se volta para a relação que partilhar a experiência e dar a conhecer denotam. O presente texto analisa os livros Palestinos, os novos judeus (1977) e Entre árabes e judeus: uma reportagem de vida (1991), da jornalista Helena Salem, do Jornal do Brasil à época da Guerra do Yom Kippur. Com apoio em uma leitura da narrativa, o artigo considera os livros como espaço de reflexão sobre a prática e o saber jornalísticos, de elaboração da crítica, de formulação da experiência e de fixação da memória.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.055
Scholarly communication0.0210.021
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERINSame topicCultural, Media, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207