MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749993028 · doi:10.1002/acs.2804

Stabilization and reference tracking for constrained switching systems: A predictive control approach

2017· article· en· W2749993028 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)NoveltyConstraint (computer-aided design)Model predictive controlComputer scienceController (irrigation)State (computer science)Tracking (education)Control (management)Control engineeringMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In this paper, the problem of designing a compensator capable of ensuring constraint satisfaction and tracking performance for a plant switching among a finite family of constrained linear time‐invariant configurations is investigated. We assume that switching occurrences are governed by a logical rule, which prescribes that any information pertaining to time or state dependence of the system mode transitions is unavailable to the controller side. The novelty of the proposed approach, based on the exploitation of command governor ideas in connection with the receding horizon control philosophy, relies on the capability to online manage unpredictable mode switching by jointly preserving uniformly ultimate boundedness and constraint fulfillment despite any admissible disturbance effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it