Dual band high‐gain antenna with beam switching capability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents an antenna with dual‐band and high‐gain for a wireless local area network and Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access applications operating over 3.4–3.6 and 5–6 GHz bands. The proposed antenna is composed of three double‐sided bowtie radiators loaded by a 2 × 6 array of double split rectangular (DSR) unit cells, which leads to a considerable gain enhancement. The DSR unit cell acts as an equivalent medium with a high refractive index operating at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz. By loading 2 × 6 arrays of proposed unit cells in the off‐axis of the bowtie antenna in the H‐plane, the main beam direction is tilted by 17° and 20° at the 3.5 and 5.5 GHz bands, respectively. A prototype of the bowtie antenna loaded with asymmetric unit cells in the H‐plane is fabricated and measured. The measured results confirm the deflection of the main beam direction by 17° at 3.5 and 20° at 5.5 GHz with a peak gain of 10 and 10.5 dBi, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".