Consideraciones en torno al contacto entre lenguas y el cambio lingüístico. Repensando el bilingüismo sumerio-acadio del tercer y segundo milenio a. C.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Na presente pesquisa, tendo em conta o fenômeno da “mudança linguística”, estudaremos como as duas línguas da Baixa Mesopotâmia, o sumério e o acádio, estiveram ligadas e influenciaram-se mutuamente entre o terceiro e segundo milênios a. C. a partir de empréstimos semânticos e sintáticos. Além disso, consideramos as abordagens etnográficas e arqueológicas feitas por vários estudiosos que pensaram sobre como ambas as línguas estiveram ligadas. Finalmente, vamos refletir sobre o uso de topônimos demarcadores de alteridades demográficas que mostram, como no caso de mar-tu, a existência de populações estrangeiras com hábitos marcados como inferiores, mas que, posteriormente, obtiveram a hegemonia político-social na região.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".