MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750318024 · doi:10.1038/icb.2017.68

Interleukin‐7 in the transition of bone marrow progenitors to the thymus

2017· article· en· W2750318024 on OpenAlexafffund
Adam W. Plumb, Abdalla Sheikh, Douglas A. Carlow, Daniel T. Patton, Hermann J. Ziltener, N. B. Abraham

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology and Cell Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsProgenitor cellBone marrowImmunologyCell biologySignal transductionBiologyProgenitorInterleukinStem cellCancer researchCytokine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interleukin‐7 (IL‐7) is essential for the development of T cells in humans and mice where deficiencies in IL‐7 signaling result in severe immunodeficiency. T cells require IL‐7 at multiple points during development; however, it is unclear when IL‐7 is first necessary. We observed that mice with impaired IL‐7 signaling had a large reduction in the number of early thymic progenitors (ETPs) while mice that overexpress IL‐7 had greatly increased numbers of ETPs. These results indicated that the development of ETPs is sensitive to IL‐7. Bone marrow progenitors of ETP are present in normal numbers in mice with impaired IL‐7 signaling (IL‐7Rα 449F ) and were efficiently recruited to the thymus. Furthermore, ETPs and their progenitors from IL‐7Rα 449F mice did not undergo increased apoptosis and proliferate normally compared to WT cells. Mixed bone marrow chimeras demonstrated that IL‐7 signaling has a cell‐intrinsic role in ETP development but was not required for development of bone marrow progenitors. We have shown a novel role for IL‐7 signaling in the development of ETPs that is distinct from classic mechanisms of IL‐7 regulating survival and proliferation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunology and Cell BiologySame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207