¡CONGA NO VA! LOS GUARDIANES DE LAS LAGUNAS: DEFENDIENDO LA TIERRA, EL AGUA Y LA LIBERTAD EN CAJAMARCA, PERÚ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los Guardianes de las Lagunas de Conga en la región de Cajamarca es un caso de estudio de un movimiento de justicia del medio ambiente que nació en 1999 en contra de la minería a cielo abierto de Yanacocha, cuyos dueños son Newmont Mining Corporation (U.S.), Buenaventura (Perú) y el Banco Mundial. Desde el 2011, estas corporaciones quieren expandir su proyecto minero hacia lo que han denominado Minas Conga, lo que ha intensificado las actividades del movimiento de justicia. El artículo muestra la defensa del territorio, el agua y la libertad por los protectores del agua. Se centra en la participación de mujeres y hombres campesinos, comunidades indígenas y sociedad civil. Se presentan tres momentos de la lucha de clases, primero, la defensa de la tierra; segundo, la protección del agua; y tercero, la batalla por la libertad. Como resultado, los miembros del movimiento están sufriendo la presencia de la policía y los militares, represión, acoso, persecución fiscal, detenciones ilegales, prisión y muerte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".