MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2750463382 · doi:10.14288/1.0342793

Neighbourhood change and women in social housing : the Oneesan container housing experience

2017· article· en· W2750463382 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrea Haber

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)Public housingBusinessEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Project Focus and Objectives: This research project explores the micro-level impacts of neighbourhood changes on the lives of women living in Oneesan Container Housing, a supportive housing site in Vancouver’s Downtown East Side (DTES) Oppenheimer District (DEOD). Research Contributions: Academic literature often depicts gentrification as a linear and nearly homogenous pattern; this study provides a nuanced picture of gentrification impacts and neighbourhood change impacts at the neighbourhood and street levels. Findings on Neighbourhood Change: Three major neighbourhood changes have been noted in the years since Oneesan welcomed its first residents in 2013. First, the DTES Street Market has opened a new location at 501 Powell Street, on a lot that sits directly behind Oneesan. Second, there has been an increase in social housing in the neighbourhood, with over 380 units built since 2013. Finally, several new cafés and restaurants have opened in the neighbourhood. These businesses are perceived to mainly serve middle to upper class patrons, and are representative of larger gentrification processes in the DEOD neighbourhood. Findings on the Impacts of Neighbourhood Change: Through surveys, interviews and observations, it was found that the impacts and perceptions of neighbourhood changes were mixed. While the DTES Street Market serves as an economic opportunity for DTES residents, most of whom are struggling financially, it also poses concerns for Oneesan residents regarding illegal activities and the people the market will attract. The new social housing in the neighbourhood serves as a positive neighbourhood change, housing many vulnerable individuals on the DTES. Oneesan residents saw the benefit of this housing, but also expressed some minor concerns regarding the addition of new people to the neighbourhood. Correspondingly, some understood the new cafés and restaurants as a negative neighbourhood change, while one resident noted her enjoyment of one of these new businesses. Ultimately, these major neighbourhood changes take place within a wider context of social, economic and political forces. Considering recent changes in city planning policy, it is hypothesized that Oneesan’s neighbourhood will see even more changes in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism→French-language works237,207→