Properties of a family 56 carbohydrate-binding module and its role in the recognition and hydrolysis of β-1,3-glucan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BH0236 from Bacillus halodurans is a multimodular β-1,3-glucanase comprising an N-terminal family 81 glycoside hydrolase catalytic module, an internal family 6 carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) that binds the nonreducing end of β-1,3-glucan chains, and an uncharacterized C-terminal module classified into CBM family 56. Here, we determined that this latter CBM, BhCBM56, bound the soluble β-1,3-glucan laminarin with a dissociation constant ( K d ) of ∼26 μm and displayed higher affinity for insoluble β-1,3-glucans with K d values of ∼2–10 μm but lacked affinity for β-1,3-glucooligosaccharides. The X-ray crystal structure of BhCBM56 and NMR-derived chemical shift mapping of the binding site revealed a β-sandwich fold, with the face of one β-sheet possessing the β-1,3-glucan–binding surface. On the basis of the functional and structural properties of BhCBM56, we propose that it binds a quaternary polysaccharide structure, most likely the triple helix adopted by polymerized β-1,3-glucans. Consistent with the BhCBM56 and BhCBM6/56 binding profiles, deletion of the CBM56 from BH0236 decreased activity of the enzyme on the insoluble β-1,3-glucan curdlan but not on soluble laminarin; additional deletion of the CBM6 also did not affect laminarin degradation but further decreased curdlan hydrolysis. The pseudo-atomic solution structure of BH0236 determined by small-angle X-ray scattering revealed structural insights into the nature of avid binding by the BhCBM6/56 pair and how the orientation of the active site in the catalytic module factors into recognition and degradation of β-1,3-glucans. Our findings reinforce the notion that catalytic modules and their cognate CBMs have complementary specificities, including targeting of polysaccharide quaternary structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".