Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article speak, of simple form, about historical process of the hakitía,language Judeo-Moroccan still said in Canada, United States, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina,Spain, France, Morocco and Israel for sefarditas Jews. In it structuralism method ofresearch is adopted, therefore it involves the main boarding of that it is; why; when; whereand who says the hakitía. Its origin in Spain also has the diachronic contextualization of thehakítico-falantes turning itself it — with the expulsion of the Jews in 1492 — its linguisticroutes. As he is above mentioned, the article has as estimated general Saussure’sstructuralism. The sources of research for compilation of the article had been removed ofrare workmanships on hakitía that exist written in Portuguese; for the author, who says thelanguage; e with the contribution of the paraense Jewish community. The work still showsto an excerpt of letter and some said popular of the hakitía. It has a part article destined tothe use of language as factor of cultural identity and to say of occultation anthropologicand ethnologic factors among others.KEY WORDS: Hakitía, Sephardim, Linguistics,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".