MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750618255 · doi:10.5670/oceanog.2017.234

Marine Mammals Exploring the Oceans Pole to Pole: A Review of the MEOP Consortium

2017· review· en· W2750618255 on OpenAlexaff
Anne M. Treasure, Fabien Roquet, Isabelle Ansorge, Marthán N Bester, Lars Boehme, Horst Bornemann, Jean‐Benoit Charrassin, Damien Chevallier, Daniel P. Costa, Christophe Guinet, Mike O. Hammill, Robert Harcourt, Mark A. Hindell, Kit M. Kovacs, Mary‐Anne Lea, Phil Lovell, Andrew Lowther, Christian Lydersen, Trevor McIntyre, Clive McMahon, Mônica M. C. Muelbert, Keith W. Nicholls, Baptiste Picard, Gilles Reverdin, Andrew W. Trites, Guy Williams, P J Nico de Bruyn

Bibliographic record

VenueOceanography · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Antarctic SurveyUniversity of PretoriaNatural Environment Research CouncilMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleDirectorate for Biological SciencesNorsk PolarinstituttCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of St AndrewsUniversity of TasmaniaMacquarie UniversityUniversité de StrasbourgSight Research UK
KeywordsOceanographyMarine speciesMarine protected areaMarine researchEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEnvironmental scienceFisheryGeologyEcologyHabitatBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International audience

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations197
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOceanographySame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207