161. WHO CARES? AN INVESTIGATION OF THE HEALTH AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL CARE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS LIVING IN SCOTLAND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Effective and sufficient levels of care and support for individuals newly diagnosed and those with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are needed to ensure optimal physical and mental health, as well as health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to explore the extent of care needs among individuals with RA living in Scotland and the factors that contribute to them, such as co-morbidities, perceived caregiver burden and complex care needs. Methods: A cross-sectional study of individuals with RA who responded to an online survey (available 11 Nov 2015 to 22 Jan 2016) who were aged ≥16 years, lived in Scotland and reported they had received a clinical diagnosis of RA. Respondents were allowed to skip questions they wished not to answer; standardized instruments were used (e.g., the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire and the Self-Perceived Burden Scale). Descriptive analyses of quantitative data and thematic analyses of free text responses were conducted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".