MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750750983

Dual-frequency admittance property of two sections transmission-line and application

2016· article· en· W2750750983 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad A. Maktoomi, Md Hedayatullah Maktoomi, Ajay Pratap Yadav, Mohammad Hashmi, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Conference Proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical impedanceTransformerImpedance matchingAdmittance parametersTransmission lineAdmittanceElectric power transmissionAcousticsQuarter-wave impedance transformerWilkinson power dividerElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Materials scienceEngineeringVoltageFrequency dividerPhysicsPower dividers and directional couplers
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an interesting dual-frequency behavior of admittance of two sections transmission-line (TSTL) terminated into a real impedance is reported. Furthermore, it is shown that the Monzon two-section dual-frequency impedance transformer is a special case of the reported technique and can be derived from this property itself. In addition, the discovered property leads to a modified dual-frequency L-type matching network that provides better transformation-ratio than the Monzon transformer. As an application, a dual-frequency T-junction power divider has been fabricated on FR4 substrate to show the practical utility of the presented theory. The simulated and measured results clearly exhibit good performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Conference ProceedingsSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207