MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O35. THE AUTOIMMUNE GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF CHILDHOOD-ONSET RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2017· article· en· W2750836136 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Hinks, Miranda C. Marion, Joanna Cobb, Marc Sudman, Hannah C. Ainsworth, Mary E. Comeau, John F. Bohnsack, Lucy R. Wedderburn, Johannes‐Peter Haas, Vibeke Videm, Marite Rygg, Ellen Nordal, Rae S. M. Yeung, Alan Rosenberg, Carl D. Langefeld, Susan D. Thompson, Wendy Thomson, Sampath Prahalad

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisAutoimmune diseaseGenetic architectureImmunologyDermatologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified susceptibility loci for many autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). About 5% of children with JIA have rheumatoid factor positive polyarthritis that is phenotypically similar to adults with seropositive RA, suggesting an extremely early onset of RA consistent with the childhood onset of RA (CORA). To better understand the genetic architecture of CORA risk relative to adult RA and other autoimmune diseases, we genotyped a cohort of CORA cases and controls on the Immunochip, a custom genotyping array. Methods: Immunochip genotyping was completed on 340 CORA cases and 11,624 controls. Following stringent SNP and sample QC, SNPs were tested for association with CORA using a logistic regression model with Caucasian admixture proportions (ADMIXTURE) as covariates (SNPLash). False discovery rate (FDR) adjusted p-values (PFDR) are reported to account for the actual number of tests computed. Weighted genetic risk scores (wGRS) of top RA loci and JIA oligoarthritis and RF negative polyarthritis risk loci were calculated and logistic regression performed to assess whether the scores were good predictors of CORA. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to define the sensitivity and specificity of each wGRS and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207