Assessing the Impact of Price Advance in Customer Quality Investigation and Repurchase Incentives (Case Study: Amiran Chain Stores in Karaj)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of price promotion on the customer quality assessment and purchase repeat incentives. This study in terms of purpose is a practical research and is in causal researches category. In order to survey the proposed hypotheses and statistical analysis, the field method, and to data collection, the questionnaire are used. The statistical population of this study is consisted of the customers of KarajâÂÂs Amiran chain stores that in this stage after questionnaire distribution using proportional sampling method, ultimately 300 questionnaires have been completed. To test the hypotheses, the structural equation modeling method and LISREL software are used. According to the data analysis, the results suggested that price promotion has a positive and significant impact on product quality, service quality, satisfaction and motivation of repeat the purchase in KarajâÂÂs Amiran chain stores; product quality and service quality has a positive and significant impact on satisfaction in KarajâÂÂs Amiran chain stores and also satisfaction has a positive and significant impact on repeat the purchase in KarajâÂÂs Amiran chain stores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".