MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750860927

Assessing the Impact of Price Advance in Customer Quality Investigation and Repurchase Incentives (Case Study: Amiran Chain Stores in Karaj)

2017· article· en· W2750860927 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shekoufeh Ghezelbash, Hussein Khodadadi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHalal products and consumer behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLISRELPromotion (chess)Product (mathematics)IncentiveStructural equation modelingService qualityQuality (philosophy)MarketingCustomer satisfactionService (business)Data collectionComputer scienceBusinessStatisticsMathematicsEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to assess the impact of price promotion on the customer quality assessment and purchase repeat incentives. This study in terms of purpose is a practical research and is in causal researches category. In order to survey the proposed hypotheses and statistical analysis, the field method, and to data collection, the questionnaire are used. The statistical population of this study is consisted of the customers of Karaj’s Amiran chain stores that in this stage after questionnaire distribution using proportional sampling method, ultimately 300 questionnaires have been completed. To test the hypotheses, the structural equation modeling method and LISREL software are used. According to the data analysis, the results suggested that price promotion has a positive and significant impact on product quality, service quality, satisfaction and motivation of repeat the purchase in Karaj’s Amiran chain stores; product quality and service quality has a positive and significant impact on satisfaction in Karaj’s Amiran chain stores and also satisfaction has a positive and significant impact on repeat the purchase in Karaj’s Amiran chain stores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicHalal products and consumer behaviorFrench-language works237,207