MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Differential Cross Section and Photon-Beam Asymmetry for the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1232</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> Reaction at Forward <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math> Angles for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.95</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2018· article· lv· W2750900286 on OpenAlexaff
H. Kohri, S. H. Shiu, W. C. Chang, Y. Yanai, D. S. Ahn, J. K. Ahn, J Y Chen, S. Daté, H. Ejiri, H. Fujimura, M̄. Fujiwara, S. Fukui, W. Gohn, K. Hicks, Atsushi Hosaka, T. Hotta, Sanghoon Hwang, K. Imai, T. Ishikawa, K. Joo, Yuji Katō, Y. Kon, H. S. Lee, Y. Maeda, T. Mibe, M. Miyabe, Y. Morino, N. Muramatsu, T. Nakano, Y. Nakatsugawa, Seung-il Nam, M. Niiyama, H. Noumi, Yoji Ohashi, T. Ohta, Makoto Oka, J. D. Parker, C. Rangacharyulu, S. Y. Ryu, T. Sawada, H. Shimizu, E. A. Strokovsky, Y. Sugaya, M. Sumihama, T. Tsunemi, M. Uchida, M. Ungaro, S. Y. Wang, M. Yosoi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAsymmetryNuclear physicsVector meson dominanceParticle physicsMesonQuarkCross section (physics)PhotonParity (physics)NucleonProtonScattering cross-sectionVirtual particleScatteringOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differential cross sections and photon-beam asymmetries for the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}^{++}(1232)$ reaction have been measured for $0.7&lt;\mathrm{cos}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{m}.}&lt;1$ and ${E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}=1.5--2.95\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ at SPring-8/LEPS. The first-ever high statistics cross-section data are obtained in this kinematical region, and the asymmetry data for $1.5&lt;{E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}(\mathrm{GeV})&lt;2.8$ are obtained for the first time. This reaction has a unique feature for studying the production mechanisms of a pure $u\overline{u}$ quark pair in the final state from the proton. Although there is no distinct peak structure in the cross sections, a non-negligible excess over the theoretical predictions is observed at ${E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}=1.5--1.8\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$. The asymmetries are found to be negative in most of the present kinematical regions, suggesting the dominance of $\ensuremath{\pi}$ exchange in the $t$ channel. The negative asymmetries at forward meson production angles are different from the asymmetries previously measured for the photoproduction reactions producing a $d\overline{d}$ or an $s\overline{s}$ quark pair in the final state. Advanced theoretical models introducing nucleon resonances and additional unnatural-parity exchanges are needed to reproduce the present data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.015
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.016
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0130.013
Scholarly communication0.0130.011
Open science0.0160.014
Research integrity0.0150.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6020.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207