Design and Economic Analysis of a Thermochemical Lignocellulosic Biomass-to-Butanol Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel continuous lignocellulosic biomass-to-butanol process using a thermochemical route and a mixed-alcohol synthesis catalyst has been developed. The process was designed and modeled using Aspen Plus and consists of major process steps such as biomass drying; indirect steam gasification; syngas cleanup and conditioning; mixed-alcohol synthesis over a modified methanol catalyst; alcohol separation; and utilities including cooling water, steam, and power generation. A heat integration analysis was also carried out, resulting in an energy-sufficient process with no requirement for external hot utilities and net power production. A technoeconomic analysis was carried out using results of the Aspen Plus model, equipment cost estimates, and discounted cash flow analysis, with an assumption of n th-plant costs and financing resulting in a minimum butanol selling price (MBSP) of $0.83/L. Different plant and cost parameter scenarios were rigorously explored using a sensitivity analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".