MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750957893 · doi:10.1109/cnsm.2016.7818431

Let's adapt to network change: Towards energy saving with rate adaptation in SDN

2016· article· en· W2750957893 on OpenAlexaff
Samy Zemmouri, Shahin Vakilinia, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGreedy algorithmNetwork topologySoftware-defined networkingAdaptation (eye)Energy consumptionDistributed computingHeuristicMathematical optimizationGenetic algorithmComputer networkAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exponential growth of network users and their communication demands have led to a tangible increment of energy consumption in network infrastructures. A new networking paradigm called Software-Defined Networking (SDN) recently emerged which simplifies network management by offering programmability of network devices. SDN assists to lower link data rates via rate-adaptation technique which reduces power consumption of the network. The main idea behind this paper is to find a distribution of traffic flows over pre-calculated paths which allow adapting the transmission rate of maximum links into lower states. We first formulate the problem as a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) problem. We then present four different computationally efficient algorithms namely greedy first fit, greedy best fit, greedy worst fit and a meta-heuristic genetic algorithm to solve the problem for a realistic network topology. Simulation results show that the genetic algorithm consistently outperforms the three greedy algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207