MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750976195 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.557093

Proceedings Of The 18Th International Conference On Biomedical Applications Of Electrical Impedance Tomography

2017· article· en· W2750976195 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenBU/Boston University Institutional Repository (Boston University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyTekesNational Research FoundationBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungInstrumentariumin TiedesäätiöEuropean CommissionNational Institutes of HealthTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuVienna Science and Technology FundGlaxoSmithKlineJane ja Aatos Erkon SäätiöConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsElectrical impedance tomographyPresentation (obstetrics)Electrical impedanceComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Biomedical Applications of <strong>ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY</strong> Edited by Alistair Boyle, Ryan Halter, Ethan Murphy, Andy Adler June 21-24, 2017 Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA This document is the collection of papers accepted for presentation at the 18th International Conference on Biomedical Applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography.<br> <br> Each individual paper in this collection: © 2017 by the indicated authors. Collected work: © 2017 Alistair Boyle, Ryan Halter, Ethan Murphy, Andy Adler

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenBU/Boston University Institutional Repository (Boston University)Same topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207