Privacy, Domesticity, and Women in Early Modern England; <br>Subordinate Subjects: Gender, the Political Nation, and Literary Form in England, 1588-1688
Bibliographic record
Abstract
proposait de mener ces Vierges à la modération en allant jusqu'à anticiper la honte qu'elles éprouveraient dans l'au-delà, leur faisant craindre dès ici-bas « d'alourdir par la bonne chère une chair qui est destinée à ressusciter » (p.148) révélant à tous, pour l'éternité, leur gourmandise ?Disons pour terminer que le travail soigné et de qualité de l'éditeur Constant Venesoen s'enrichit de références aux sources ainsi que de corrections, au besoin, qui viennent éclairer les citations de Jean Girard de Villethierry.Celles-ci proviennent principalement de saint Paul et des Pères de l'Église, ce qui permet de voir la manière dont le compilateur a coulé le contemptus mundi sans effort dans son discours sur la virginité.Signalons un utile index des références scripturaires à la fin du volume qui fait saisir d'un coup d'œil la part prépondérante de Paul pour le Nouveau Testament et des Psaumes pour l'Ancien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".