MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751057886 · doi:10.1002/pmic.201700299

And Yet it is Modified—Holding a Candle to the Dark Matter of White Matter

2017· letter· en· W2751057886 on OpenAlexaff
George Harauz

Bibliographic record

VenuePROTEOMICS · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyelinProteomeWhite matterMyelin basic proteinBiologyProteomicsOligodendrocyteNeuroscienceCell biologyBioinformaticsGeneticsCentral nervous systemGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multilamellar membrane myelin sheath of the CNS, that enwraps axons to facilitate saltatory conduction in higher vertebrates, is held together by myelin basic protein (MBP). Yet this generalization masks how enigmatic MBP is, much like cosmological "dark matter." First, the casual use of the singular form for "protein" distracts that there are multiple, developmentally regulated "classic" splice isoforms ranging from 14 to 21.5 kDa, each with extensive PTMs. Second, the static image of MBP adhering two cytoplasmic leaflets of the oligodendrocyte membrane together in close apposition, suggests it to be inaccessible to modifying enzymes. And yet it is modified (to paraphrase Galileo's phrase on the earth's motion). In this issue of Proteomics, Sarg et al. apply an integrated CE-MS approach to investigate the PTMs of 18.5 kDa MBP from mouse brains of different ages. They identify new sites and types of modification, as well as confirming previously known PTMs. Innovative tools for unraveling the intricacies of the myelin basic proteome and how it organizes CNS myelin (much like basic histones organize chromatin), will help us understand white matter development and plasticity in health, during ageing, and in demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePROTEOMICSSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207